"Bravo Christmas Special" Gets Trashed

NAME MESSAGE
Ted posted 12/14/04 07:01 PM Central Time (US)     No E-mail no email address given
Although the review isn't the most insightful, David Blum gave "The Christmas Special Special" a bad review in today's New York Sun - and even said perhaps it needs some more Bing!

A Jingle Bell Rip-Off
by David Blum
New York Sun, December 14, 2004

What has happened to Bravo? Ever since it lost, wait a minute, what did it have again? I'm thinking it's possible I never watched Bravo, except that I vaguely remember some "Larry Sanders" reruns in there somewhere, and a brief flirtation with "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" until I got bored with that repetitive premise and those wacky gay guys. I also seem to remember enjoying "Significant Others" in there somewhere, but maybe I only pretended to like it. In any case, Bravo recently became of the NBC family, which means that Jeff Zucker -- who, regular readers will recall, is an idiot -- now controls its programming direction from on high. Could Mr. Zucker have possibly signed off on the "Christmas Special Christmas Special" that airs tonight at 8 p.m. on Bravo? Hard to believe. I loved Christmas programming as a kid, almost as much as I enjoyed a good Ronco holiday infomercial about steak knives. ("But wait, there's more!" was a young boy's introduction to a faraway world where irony did not exist.) I seem to remember loving "Amahl and the Night Visitors" even though it was, as one commentator mentioned scornfully, "opera on television." I liked "The Grinch" and other cartoons, but it all paled before the mighty "Charlie Brown Christmas." That one always got to me, and probably just about everyone else of my generation, as the yarn about a group of young friends who taught each other the true meaning of Christmas. Great music, great dancing, and a wonderful message.

It was one of this special's few revelations that Charles Schulz, the creator of "Peanuts," had been warned against the use of scripture in the dialogue for the special, his first for television. But in the end, Schulz fought for and won the great sermon from Linus, which among other things quotes directly from the King James Bible (Luke 2: 8-14). I will never be able to erase from memory the mellifluous sound of Linus's voice as he read from memory this famous line: "for to you is born this day in the city of David a savior who is Christ the Lord." It turns out an uncredited actor named Christopher Shea voiced the Linus character; wouldn't he have made a better interview for this special than Tammy Faye Messner? They might also have mentioned the great jazz score from Vince Guaraldi. But that would have been way too interesting and ambitious for this documentary, which repeats only the most obvious insights and recollections of its commentators.

I've long feared in pop documentary what I call the "subtraction of knowledge," wherein you read or observe a piece of journalism that, by the end, causes you to feel less intelligent than you did when you started. It's scary and depressing, and it surfaced during the closing credits of this wasted hour of television. The producers sacrificed a chance to be insightful and witty about Christmas, and instead delivered a documentary devoid of ideas, with commentary from the likes of Loni Anderson and Lorna Luft. It was vaguely creepy to experience Paul Reubens, the former Pee-Wee Herman, as a social historian, and Simon Doonan's warped perspective was confused and unhelpful.

The main idea behind the special was to celebrate the television industry's continued infatuation with Christmas as a programming opportunity. Year after year came examples of shows that used the holiday as a gambit for viewers, and it always worked. I will admit to enjoying the special's one little glimpse of an outtake from a television classic, even though there should have been far more in an hour produced under the auspices of NBC -- the shot of Judy Garland as she flubbed a line from her phony-family Christmas special and declared, "Gosh darn it!" A rare moment of character insight in the "Christmas Special Christmas Special," it brought a moment briefly to life that might otherwise have been lost. But did we really need to see so many clips of Bob Hope in Vietnam? They paled in comparison to the more touching moment between Bing Crosby and David Bowie as they sang together one year. All out of order, all to no particular point. The narration by Carson Kressley (of "Queer Eye") contributed no insight except into the creative bankruptcy of Bravo.

Steven Lewis posted 12/16/04 12:09 PM Central Time (US)     No E-mail no email address given
The BRAVO Christmas special is now history. We'll probably see it again next year. At least they placed "alleged" in front of "child abuser" when they sunk their teeth into Bing. However, I suspect to many folks the "alleged" was drowned out by the sound of slurping egg nog. Meanwhile, one can imagine what notions "child abuser" must have elicited in the minds of the viewers. Sexual abuse? Sadism? The facts are that by modern standards most of us over the age of 40 were victims of parental child abuse. You youngsters should check out the original "Cheaper by the Dozen" -- the one that starred Clifton Webb. If Bravo is going to label someone a child abuser they should at least specify in what context they refer. Bing whipped his first set of boys when they misbehaved. Big deal. So did most other responsible dads of Bing's generation.

Anyway, I learned from BRAVO that Christmas specials are made up of families that often are dysfunctional. I suspect we all could have passed the quiz without going to class. Yawn. At least we got to see a few glimpses of Bing and Perry and Andy and Judy perform, so the hour wasn't a total waste.
Jon O. posted 12/08/04 09:29 PM Central Time (US)    E-mail contact the author directly
Well, I give up. I get so tired of writing to and rebutting authors of stupid articles like these, I'm just going to vent here.

Can you believe this guy was given his own column? "Dude, dude, dude", he says, "don't let the cardigan sweaters fool you". I wonder if this paragon of journalism's main inspiration is Beavis or Butthead? No, even they were probably before his time.

He goes on, rewriting history by not only accepting the hackneyed and inaccurate child abuse claims, but adding spousal abuse to Bing's perceived list of crimes as well. Then he continues, "His daughter testifies [in the "Christmas Special Christmas Special"] that one of his sons had to be dragged kicking and screaming onto the set for each annual production." Well, according to what Harry and Mary Frances said on the Hollywood Palace special on PBS, they LOVED being on the Christmas shows. Perhaps her "testimony" on the "Christmas Special x2" was heavily edited to make Bing appear insensitive. Perhaps Nathaniel "kicked and screamed" at the prospect of appearing on the shows when he was younger. But, as a father of three young children, I can tell you that there's a lot of "kicking and screaming" involved in trying to get your kids to do any number of things. Kids DO that sometimes, "dude".

"Pure, unadulterated fraud", he says, as he describes the traditional Christmas specials of the Sixties and Seventies. Sounds like a more apt description of his article. And possibly of the show he’s “reviewing”. Gee, I can’t wait to watch this one.

Carmela posted 12/08/04 11:43 PM Central Time (US)     No E-mail no email address given
I don't think I'll watch this Special. We work so hard trying to get the truth out there about Bing and then a few idiots come along who know nothing about him and try to destroy his image. Bah Humbug!I think I'll watch "White Christmas" when this is on!
Ted posted 12/09/04 09:14 AM Central Time (US)     No E-mail no email address given
Glad to see I'm not the only one who found that bit incredibly obnoxious. One of the few things I dread about "What's News" is that every year, when December roll around, we are treat to the same Crosby-bashing, all in the name of modern irony and eye-rolling.

Humbug indeed.
Ted posted 12/09/04 09:28 AM Central Time (US)     No E-mail no email address given
P.S. As always, if anyone wants the real story, well-sourced, read Steven Lewis's "Christmas Story" examination.
Steven Lewis posted 12/09/04 02:21 PM Central Time (US)     No E-mail no email address given
I just sent this email to BRAVO TV:

I was saddened and disappointed to see reviews of the forthcoming Christmas special that indicated Bravo would be smearing the reputations of many of our Christmas icons, including Bing Crosby and Andy Williams. I would hope that a channel called Bravo would have higher standards. If you want to do something positive with your Christmas specials perhaps you could re-run some of the classic holidays specials of the past, such as Bing's final TV Christmas special with David Bowie and Twiggy.
Jon O. posted 12/09/04 03:29 PM Central Time (US)    E-mail contact the author directly
Steven, you have inspired me to rise up out of my funk and take action! I e-mail Bravo as well:

I was looking forward to watching "The Christmas Special Christmas Special" until I read the following review, which made me somewhat wary of the show's motives.

If this program is anywhere near as cynical as the reviewer describes it to be, then I would prefer to have nothing to do with it. Please say it ain't so. Many of us out here in TV Land (NOT the cable network) have fond memories of the Christmas specials we grew up watching as children, and would rather not witness a bashing session. IMO, you'd be wiser to air the original Christmas shows, especially the Bing Crosby specials.



||| Bing Crosby Internet Museum Home Page ||| Bing FAQS